Reply to the comment on “Rainfall erosivity in Europe” by Auerswald et al.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reply to the comment on "Rainfall erosivity in Europe" by Auerswald et al.
Recently, in the Auerswald et al. (2015) comment on "Rainfall erosivity in Europe", 5 criticisms were addressed: i) the neglect of seasonal erosion indices, ii) the neglect of published studies and data, iii) the low temporal resolution of the data, especially of the maximum rain intensity, iv) the use of precipitation data instead of rain data and the subsequent deviation of the R-factor in Ge...
متن کاملComment on "Rainfall erosivity in Europe" by Panagos et al. (Sci. Total Environ., 511, 801-814, 2015).
Recently a rainfall erosivity map has been published. We show that the values of this map contain considerable bias because (i) the temporal resolution of the rain data was insufficient, which likely underestimates rain erosivity by about 20%, (ii) no attempt had been included to account for the different time periods that were used for different countries, which can modify rain erosivity by mo...
متن کاملReply to Comment by Young et al.
Had our study been, as Young et al. imply, a data trawling exercise using hundreds of variables to look for a 'thread', then doubts about its validity might be justified. However, their account of our work bears little relationship to the methods, results or conclusions we report. For example, Young et al. claim that we used 396 tests to address our primary hypothesis. In fact, we used two. You...
متن کاملRainfall erosivity in Europe.
Rainfall is one the main drivers of soil erosion. The erosive force of rainfall is expressed as rainfall erosivity. Rainfall erosivity considers the rainfall amount and intensity, and is most commonly expressed as the R-factor in the USLE model and its revised version, RUSLE. At national and continental levels, the scarce availability of data obliges soil erosion modellers to estimate this fact...
متن کاملReply to Frizzell et al.’s comment to our comment
I agree with O’Brien et al.’s comment to our comment of their paper that in order for there to be inertial cavitation, the nuclei must be smaller than resonant size, and therefore less than 2 mm in diameter, much smaller than the mean alveolar diameter. Yet it seems entirely unreasonable to suggest that not a single such small nuclei exist in the immediate vicinity of the alveoli sacs, which ar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Science of The Total Environment
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0048-9697
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.020